<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Quomodocumque</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Math, Madison, food, the Orioles, books, my kids.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:37:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yitang Zhang, bounded gaps, primes as random numbers by Thads</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/yitang-zhang-bounded-gaps-primes-as-random-numbers/#comment-16499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thads]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4176#comment-16499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see the subjunctive used in the mass media!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the subjunctive used in the mass media!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yitang Zhang, bounded gaps, primes as random numbers by IB</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/yitang-zhang-bounded-gaps-primes-as-random-numbers/#comment-16497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4176#comment-16497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice story, but I think you may have misstated the prime number theorem? Or else I&#039;m confused.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice story, but I think you may have misstated the prime number theorem? Or else I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yitang Zhang, bounded gaps, primes as random numbers by NDE</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/yitang-zhang-bounded-gaps-primes-as-random-numbers/#comment-16496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NDE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4176#comment-16496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A possibly amusing observation on Zhang&#039;s result (which takes nothing from his accomplishment) is that the constant is so large that the theorem doesn&#039;t improve on the average spacing until we reach primes with many millions of digits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A possibly amusing observation on Zhang&#8217;s result (which takes nothing from his accomplishment) is that the constant is so large that the theorem doesn&#8217;t improve on the average spacing until we reach primes with many millions of digits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by JSE</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JSE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t read Freakonomics, so please explain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read Freakonomics, so please explain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by Julian Chu</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Chu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kids&#039; names above that stick out to me are Shania and Delia. Anyone who read Freakonomics will know what I mean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kids&#8217; names above that stick out to me are Shania and Delia. Anyone who read Freakonomics will know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by Julian Chu</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Chu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it&#039;s worth, 13% of 15th Reunion survey respondents (n=461) and 12% of 20th Reunion survey respondents (n=357) reported their religious affiliation as Jewish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, 13% of 15th Reunion survey respondents (n=461) and 12% of 20th Reunion survey respondents (n=357) reported their religious affiliation as Jewish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by valuevar</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[valuevar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t doubt that it was once around 20% (under some broad, unspecified definition) or at least generally felt around 20%. However, Jordan earlier linked to a discussion that implied that such figures were outdated (and, if not, would show over-representation compared to current levels of achievement). Not my specialty - it&#039;s just that non-rigorous statistics that stay in the popular consciousness long after they start losing their relation to current reality generally bug me, and this may be one of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that it was once around 20% (under some broad, unspecified definition) or at least generally felt around 20%. However, Jordan earlier linked to a discussion that implied that such figures were outdated (and, if not, would show over-representation compared to current levels of achievement). Not my specialty &#8211; it&#8217;s just that non-rigorous statistics that stay in the popular consciousness long after they start losing their relation to current reality generally bug me, and this may be one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by Dick Gross</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Gross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jordan, my name is Baruch, which my family translated into English as Benedict. Perhaps
some of the early Popes had that Hebrew name too...

Valuevar, no one knows the exact figures, as Harvard doesn&#039;t keep them (as opposed to ethnic and gender categories). But I think the population of Harvard College has been over 20% Jewish since the days that President Lowell proposed a quota (to get the number down).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan, my name is Baruch, which my family translated into English as Benedict. Perhaps<br />
some of the early Popes had that Hebrew name too&#8230;</p>
<p>Valuevar, no one knows the exact figures, as Harvard doesn&#8217;t keep them (as opposed to ethnic and gender categories). But I think the population of Harvard College has been over 20% Jewish since the days that President Lowell proposed a quota (to get the number down).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by Paul Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Rafferty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://007english007.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ENGLISH LANGUAGE REVIEW 4U&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://007english007.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/" rel="nofollow">ENGLISH LANGUAGE REVIEW 4U</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10,000 baby names of Harvard by valuevar</title>
		<link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10000-baby-names-of-harvard/#comment-16468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[valuevar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/?p=4173#comment-16468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To Dick Gross: I thought that &quot;statistic&quot; (originating, apparently, in Hillel) turned out to be doubtful? See Jordan&#039;s earlier post on Unz&#039;s work (#collapse) - apparently a weak point in it was to take those 20% or 25% claims at face value.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Dick Gross: I thought that &#8220;statistic&#8221; (originating, apparently, in Hillel) turned out to be doubtful? See Jordan&#8217;s earlier post on Unz&#8217;s work (#collapse) &#8211; apparently a weak point in it was to take those 20% or 25% claims at face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>