The moduli space of senators and the moduli space of movies

Last week I blogged about Dmitri Tymoczko’s lecture and the moduli space of chords; since then I remembered some more nice examples of “moduli spaces” in the loose sense described in that post. One comes from the work of Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal, who attempt to answer the question: what is the best way of “mapping” the members of a legislature in two-dimensional space so that two legislators are close together precisely when their voting records are very closely aligned? In other words, what is the moduli space of senators? Go to Poole’s VoteView page and scroll to the bottom to see the last 100 years of the House and Senate as an animated .gif. Or just read what I wrote about their research on Slate. (Article from 2001, so some links may be dead.)

Votes in the Senate make up a complicated dataset, which people like Poole and Rosenthal like to make more accessible by means of two-dimensional charts. An even more complicated dataset is the set of 100,000,000 Netflix ratings of 18,000 movies which the strivers for the Netflix Prize have to wrestle with. But this too can be nicely mapped into two-dimensional space (or any-dimensional space, but two-dimensional pictures are the easiest to look at!) yielding a “moduli space of movies” in which two movies are close together just when they tend to be liked by the same set of users. Todd Holloway, a CS grad student at Indiana,has made some beautiful examples:

Go to his blog to see the interactive version, or his visualization of the power struggle in Wikipedia.

Tagged , , ,

3 thoughts on “The moduli space of senators and the moduli space of movies

  1. JmSR says:

    Board Game Geek does a very good job with their personal recommendations. Of course, the “ownership” quality of games vs. the “rental” quality of films makes this obvious.

    Mine: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/user/jmsr525/recommendations
    The top level: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/thread/254274/page/1

  2. JmSR says:

    Oops, I didn’t mean “obvious”, I meant “less obviously compatible”. I need to wake up.

  3. Jim says:

    Dude, I’m on a roll…

    I read your Slate article a long time ago and loved it. I passed it along to all my like-minded family members. I just read & loved the Netflix thing the other day, and almost got the whole way through before I noticed the byline.

    Give us more!

    :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: