Scarlett Johansson gainfully posed in underwear and spiked heels for Esquire’s cover last year after the magazine named her the “sexiest woman alive.” But a French novelist’s fictional depiction of a look-alike so angered the film star that she sued the best-selling author for defamation.
The inappropriate “but” is one of the sneakiest rhetorical tricks there is. It presents the second sentence as somehow contrasting with the first. It isn’t. Scarlett Johansson agreed to be photographed mostly undressed; does that make it strange or incongruous or hypocritical that she doesn’t want to be lied about in print? It does not. To be honest, I can’t think of any explanation other than weird retrograde sexism for writing the lede this way. “She got paid for looking all sexy, so who is she to complain that she was defamed?” Patricia Cohen of the New York Times, I’m awarding you an